Thursday, August 25, 2011

Oh Druggies...


Apparently those wacky South Americans are getting cheap on us. According to an article in Scientific American there are reports that more people than before are being documented as showing up requiring medical attention.

Their skin is dying and their immunity has been compromised.

This isn’t a blog about me feeling sorry for these people by the way. Just in case you didn’t know me by now. This risk is attributed to internal bleeding from small blood vessels which causes a rash on the skin that looks like this.

Drug manufacturers are diluting their cocaine using a veterinary deworming medication called levamisole. This particular medication has yet another interesting side effect. “..a sometimes fatal lowered count of white blood cells that are called neutrophils…In one disease, the body’s immune system attacks the skin; in the other, it attacks the bone marrow.”

Why do you do this stupid humans? We are all old enough to know the dangers of drugs. Why do you still take them? Why don’t you just kill yourself? Why make your friends, your family members and tax payers suffer for your idiocy?

Hospital rooms are being occupied by these people!  They made the decision that their experience was worth more than their lives.  Why are we left to pay the consequence?  Perhaps they should be turned away from hospitals so those who actually love life could be left to occupy the rooms and the medical attention.

What do you think?  Too harsh?

Monday, August 22, 2011

10 Things Girls Shouldn't Wear (6-28-07) 78 Reads

(UPDATE:  I wrote this after I wrote the guy version as a response.  Yeah...I was a bit meaner back then.  Read at your own risk.)

Current mood:creative
  10.  Lowrise jeans - Only a very small percentage of people can get away with wearing lowrise jeans.  If you have flesh buldging out, they're not for you.



    9.  Piercings - The nose one looks like a booger, the belly one looks like lint and the tongue one…yeah, bet it smells wonderful.  I won't talk about the others which I think are a tragedy.




    8. Tattoo's - Like artwork?  Put it on paper.  Will a tattoo make you some part of a group or is it a picture that you can't carry in your wallet?  What?  I don't get it.




    7. Colored contacts - This might work to change a color slightly but Chicana's, just stop it ok, you don't look good with green contacts and your brown skin.


Yeah, just try to ignore the hairy pits.


    6. Tube Tops - Only healthy, naturally blessed women can pull this off…err, keep this on.  Two words, trailer trash.


    5. Snow boots - What the hell are you thinking?  It's freakin' summer.  Southern California is not a place for Eskimo's.



    4. Thongs - Don't get me wrong, in the right outfit they look nice, but not for everyday wear.  At not if you don't have the body for it.  I'm sorry if you weren't born with the body you wish you had.  Don't make yourself look stupid by trying to pretend you were.



    3. Blonde Highlights - Take it easy with the bleach!  I see too many witchhaired girls around these days.  Striped hair doesn't look cute or sexy, it looks freakin' scary ok Barnum & Bailey.


    2. Heavy Makeup - Walk by the MAC counter lately?  Dude I have to try so hard not to laugh outloud.  Do they paint their faces in the dark?  When did Bozo become the newest Top Model?



    1. Belly Shirts - If you have a belly, darlin' that top is not for you.  I know I know, you want to look like that girl in the magazine but you don't sweetie.  Take a picture, shave off a few pounds with Photoshop then you can.  But not in public.  If your stomach rolls over your pants, don't show it to the world.  Don't wear a tight top to show off your "beubs" that grew when you put on 50 pounds.  People are looking at your belly button overlapping your beltbuckle, not your breasts.



10:43 PM
  • Apple Something I see that you picked realistic examples instead of over-the-top examples to prove your points. Good job.
  • Wife I did not approve this blog. You're in trouble

Friday, August 12, 2011

Applecasting

Every year, almost like clockwork, Apple releases new products.  People go temporarily mad, their stocks shoot through the roof and they make another few hundred million dollars.  This predictability has led to the futile but fun game I like to play called…

APPLECASTING

Sometimes there are leaks.  It IS fair to use those as your guesses because they have been sporadically unreliable.  It’s more fun though if you expand on the concept with some sort of interesting and cool little tweak.

Concept that with a border, is possible.
Every year around the same time, their current hardware is “refreshed.”  Its fun to imagine what new features will be included in the updated iteration.  This year however things have changed.  The iPhone 4 is a great but flawed device.  The form factor has a nice looking but critical antenna design flaw.  When your skin makes contact with it, you dramatically lose reception in low reception areas.  It does cause calls to drop.  A simple $5 case will solve this problem.  (Or a little sticker.)  Still, when you pay a couple of hundred dollars for tech, you don’t want it to have ANY simply resolved problems like those.


I believe the iPhone 5 will be this.
Historically, Apple keeps any major updated design changes for a few generations.  They upgrade the internal hardware but keep roughly the same form factor.  (iPhone 3G/3Gs)  The most recent and drastic change was the iPhone 4.  An interesting thing happened this year though.  The refresh did not fall on the expected update schedule leaving a window for many things.  The complaints about the antenna were pretty loud.  So much so that Apple even held a special event to “explain” (read:spin) and give away free cases.

It also happened that the last refresh period for large capacity iPod classic was skipped last year.  This could be to the plummeting relative sales.  Still a successful product but no longer the company flagship it used to be.  All of these events lead me to this blog topic.

That information, though bleak, is very exciting for people like me who like to contemplate the possibilities.  The lack of interest in an old favorite to me spells "new product."  Apple needs something fresh to excite their customers and their board members.



More like the 3G/3Gs which was comfortable to hold.
They created the iPad and that is still selling like mad.  Many media outlets online are suggesting the iPad 2S will be released.  A “pro” version if you will with the higher resolution (Retina Display) we expected with the original sequel.  The iPhone 5 is past due and I do think that will also be announced but I really don’t think it will be a major overhaul.  The shape may be dramatically different, hence the delay, but functionality wise I don’t believe it will stray too far from the current iPhone 4.  Perhaps an iPhone 4S with "4G" support?

Tapered but still iPhone 4 antenna.
One of the best things about the iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad are the apps you can use to edit your photos.  In the iPhone 4's case, it takes some amazing pictures for being a mobile phone.  I have a DSLR I use at home and I’m not kidding you when I say that under certain circumstances, the quality of the images produced by the iPhone can be equivalent.  The resolution is a lot lower than a DSLR without a doubt but the convenience and the integrated apps make it a much more pleasant experience for amateur photographers like me.  The seamless geotagging also makes it really interesting and convenient.  Geotagging with DSLR's is still a bit of a hassle.

At times I’ve found myself wishing that I had those tools on my computer so I can upload the images from my DSLR and quickly edit them without having to boot up Photoshop (or even have to buy it again.)  These free to 99 cent apps do the job just fine.  Some of the highest selling apps in the app store are photography programs.  I don’t believe Apple will ignore this fact.

I really liked this concept.
One of the biggest limitations of the iPhone 4 is the lens.  It takes some of the best cell phone photos already.  The only thing that could make them better is a bigger/higher quality lens.  Is that an option?  How could they do that?

My guess is that they won’t.  They will slightly improve the iPhone camera but will spin off a new product from the success of that feature.

My bet is that the next Apple product will be a point and shoot camera that runs iOS.

It’s nice that they have a product that does everything.  The iPhone is an internet device, a phone, a camera, an iPod, a flipcam type portable video and internet radio.  When it comes to photos (and video) they have really hit a ceiling.  There is only so high they can go before a nicer lens becomes necessary.  One with zoom for example would be really convenient.

I believe (hope) an iOS camera will be announced next month and here are some of the capabilities I think they should include.


  1. GPS for Geotagging.
  2. Zoom lens.  Probably Carl Zeiss.
  3. Expandable memory for more photos.  (They don’t want this in iPod/iPhone products but a camera would be ok.)
  4. Flash.
  5. Multi-Touch screen.
  6. No optical viewfinder.  (They ‘d want to push their iOS control.)
  7. iOS app support.
  8. Wi-Fi.  (How else would it support AirPlay?)
Apparently I'm not the only one who thought of this.
A quick search for Apple Camera images displayed a bevvy of other fan concepts.  The one above from Mac Life is most like what I envision.  Something small, something simple.  An entry level device with a telescoping zoom lens.  We shall see.

That’s my bet.  What’s yours?



(UPDATE:  There are rumors of an entirely new product line.)

Friday, August 5, 2011

The Facebook Betrayal

I NEVER used to use my real name online. I knew it was a risk. You put your real name out there, you type comments, you post pictures, you search things and you will be held accountable for them at some point.  Whatever is on the internet is there forever.

I was aware and wary of this very early on.  There were a lot of people that were as well I'm sure but that paranoid group seems to have dwindled to a small few. Since the days of BBS and much later AOL, using your real name was a rare occurrence. Usually you could spot those who weren’t technically savvy by their blatant use of their real name as a username. They fell into two groups; one, they had no idea how dangerous it could be or two, they didn’t really think it would ever affect them.

Then came social networks and their "Let me tell you about me!" architecture.


You lost that anonymity whether you wanted to or not. If you made one friend or linked to one family member, your identity was discoverable. Still, I was resisting. I used a pseudonym. Why make it easy for people right?

Enter Facebook with its promises of privacy.

Here is a snippet from their privacy policy in 2005

“No personal information that you submit to Thefacebook will be available to any user of the Web Site who does not belong to at least one of the groups specified by you in your privacy settings.”

I thought, “Hell, I’m in the tech industry and my employers are starting to question why I don’t have an online presence.” You couldn’t find a single thing when you searched for my real name and I in fact had quite the online presence. I wasn’t famous by any means but I was actively moderating several multi-hundred member user groups, posting reviews on a variety of websites, I had a website that experienced some level of success (one that earned me an interview with a very prestigious media outlet) and even made a few thousand hit videos on YouTube. None of them were using my real name or information.

Companies were already starting to take part in the Facebook pastime even performing background searches using it. I figured I had to make a clean entry by creating a now socially accepted and politically correct profile. The moment I did a tremendous (in my opinion) amount of people started adding me.

Old acquaintances and family alike were coming out of the woodwork. Most of them were people that I had little to no contact with until now. I accepted a few under my wife’s suggestion. Why not give these estranged adults a second chance? Perhaps they too have matured. Some of them did yes, but many of them did not. Unfortunately that is also evident in your profile. The type of people you associate with is reflected in your Facebook profile in many different ways.

There is an old saying that comes to mind that I’m sure has many variations. It goes roughly, “Show me who your friends are and in turn I will show you who YOU are.” In the workplace, that becomes PAINFULLY true. Some of the more embarrassing acquaintances are proud of their lifestyles and never hope to seek a professional job that requires any sort of background check into their legal or illegal activities.  Since I used my real name I started removing some of those acquaintances and making good use of Facebook’s privacy settings. That’s when I noticed things were changing.

Every few months it seemed there were new additions to the terms of service. These changes were always sharing more and more of your information. Whenever there was an update, it became a tradition of mine and a few other privacy minded individuals to figure out how to lock that information down. Little did we know that the folks Facebook was selling this information to had unlimited access to it all regardless of our privacy settings. (See: Pete Warden) or (Search: Facebook Open Graph API)

The problem with Facebook and similar social networks is that they DO offer a great service. I am NOT a social butterfly in person but I do enjoy good conversation, sharing photos and publicly contemplating and discussing current and future events. Those are all desires which are completely satisfied by social networks and blogs. These services are FAR from free. In fact, some of them are downright thievery especially when concerns are raised about photograph republishing rights. A shame because one of the primary reasons I like social networking is the photo sharing capabilities. I firmly believe that social networks are a major reason why smart phones are experiencing an incredible increase in sales. What Facebook did was centralize all these other offerings and then capitalized on their success by selling our content and information.

I understand hosting is expensive and that they MUST make their money from somewhere. Ads are frowned upon since they often become obtrusive, offensive or questionable altogether. I for one prefer limited ads (much like those previously shown by Google) since they can be removed or banned from whatever social network you’re accessing. When it is the social network itself that is taking your data…we have a MAJOR problem.

Enter Google+

The first concern usually raised is how do we trust a company that earned its fame and fortune from producing search results to keep our content from being found itself? Unfortunately we have really run out of options. Sharing on the internet is public to some degree no matter how you look at it. What Google+ offers is not a better package but a fresh beginning.

In my opinion, Google is the ONLY company savvy enough (not to mention well known) to overpower the beast Facebook has become. Google’s terms of service may change at some point in the future sure but currently it is a much better package than what Facebook is doing. The mistakes Facebook continues to make are with their apparent complete disregard for the concerns of the users. Direct support is borderline nonexistent and opt-in content sharing is ALWAYS on by default without any broadcast regarding changes.

It doesn’t seem that way (yet) with Google+. I think that’s reason enough move. After continuously pulling the carpet out from under us, 750 million users or not, you will find yourself alone again Zuckerberg. The internet is a fickle bitch and I think your time will be up soon.

Articles I recommend and sources used.